Reviews of TabMerger
List of user reviews and ratings for TabMerger
Total ratings
4.20
(Rating count:
15) Upgrade to see all 16 reviews
User reviews
Recent rating average:
3.80
All time rating average:
4.20
Upgrade to see all 16 reviews
Rating filters
5 star 4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
| Date | Author | Rating | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-01 | 全民三退解体中共邪教 | | |
| 2022-12-23 | GanJingWorld | | Gan Jing World is a clean, curated universe and a dynamic, overlapping network of integrated platforms and services. ==> https://www.ganjing.com |
| 2022-10-24 | ts9zz | | |
| 2022-06-25 | Artyom | | |
| 2021-04-14 | Firefox user 14653332 | | Tried because Onetab don't have a dark theme. TabMerger does what says, it's more kind to my eyes and make me feel more calm because there's options to undo mistakes and save my precious tabs. But I think it's over complicated, sometimes more is less. Some buttons don't need to appear or some information have a large size and isn't that important (like the day with seconds a group was created). One of the things I loved about onetab was the simplicity. Just when I move my cursor next to a link I see a X showing I could remove or how easy was using the extension without the need of a tutorial. |
| 2021-03-11 | Firefox user 16039922 | | |
| 2021-03-08 | TyFighter | | Second Edit: I decided to give it 5 stars, simply because the developer seems like a really nice dude and I also want to see this extension succeed(I see other people giving one stars, so hopefully this can counteract that). I've also had another similar experience with PocketTube, and that is the same pricing as this. I didn't realize that there are many extensions out there that are this expensive. Unfortunately, I'm not willing to pay the subscription, as I can't justify the price for what it does. I hope that updating this to 5 stars helps however, as it is easily the best tab management extension. Edit: Your right that the review was made with a lot of frustration. I am sorry for that. I've updated my review to three stars since your right, it's a good extension. That being said, there is no way I am paying for it. I understand you think the pricing is fair and that their isn't much competition in this market(namely OneTab), but I don't understand where this price is coming from. As far as I can tell, you don't use servers, so unless their is some other major expense that I'm not counting for in upkeep, all of this(besides maybe the hosting cost of the website) goes straight to you. Don't get me wrong, I think you deserve money and have every right to charge for the extension, it's just that other apps I can justify the price of the subscription while with this I can't. I think it's way too much for the features that you are offering. For example, TickTick allows me to save websites as a note using their extension as well as having an entire task manager on top of it, with calendar, focus, markdown, due dates, priority, tags, and attachments(that upload to the cloud). All of this data has to be stored on a server, and that isn't cheap. Yet they are charging the same price(for everything) that you are asking for in your basic model, which doesn't even include all of the features, while TickTick has a much greater upkeep cost per user. It's easy to understand why they charge that much. I just don't understand that price here. The main reason I'm keeping a star is taking features that were once free and locking them behind a paywall. I don't think that's cool. I also think it's entirely fair to criticize software based on pricing models. It's like buying a cake for $40 dollars while there is a cake that isn't as good(but decent enough) for $10 dollars. It's fair to criticize the $40 dollar cake since the value is clearly lower. I wish you luck, but I don't think many people are going to subscribe unless you lower prices. Right now I think this pricing model would only appeal to those that have "fuck you" money, and I am certainly not one of them. ORIGINAL REVIEW: Sudden switch to subscription model is not appreciated in the slightest. I understand the developer wants to make money but the prices are absurd. $3 dollars a month is what I pay for TickTick, a task manager that has 100x more features and has a lot more employees then this single man operation. And that is just for basic, it's freaking $9 a month for the most expensive plan!! I don't believe there are any servers he/she has to run since it's using Firefox sync/local storage(if this money is going to servers, then the dev must have choose the most expensive servers on the planet). The pricing page is super scummy, as it seems like the free version has everything(just with limits) until you click the tiny little expand arrow at the bottom of the page. I don't mind the fact that the developer wants to make money off of this extension, and I wouldn't be this upset if the pricing wasn't so unfair. Really bummed too, as this was a great extension before this, but now STAY FAR AWAY!! |
| 2021-03-01 | Sammy Woodland | | I came from OneTab, and at first really really liked this. But every once in a while, it deletes all my tabs for no reason. This isn't a huge deal the way I'm using it, but it's something that would be nice to fix. I use Firefox on Pop!_OS (Ubuntu based) with the following extensions: Beagle Button - Sustainable Shopping, Dark Reader, Don't touch my tabs! (rel=noopener), Grammar and Spell Checker — LanguageTool, IPFS Companion, Kutt, NoScript, Plasma Integration, Reddit Enhancement Suite, TabMerger, Terms of Service; Didn’t Read, uBlock Origin |
| 2021-02-11 | Bryce | | |
| 2021-02-10 | Firefox user 12519857 | | TabMerger is a very handy extension, but it has one big drawback. Let me explain what I mean. For example, I created a group of 3 tabs called Forums. On the first tab of this group, I added a forum with 8 pages, on the second tab, a forum with 30 pages, and on the third, with 50 pages at the time the group was created. One day passed and I opened a created group called Forums to read the news. During this time, the first tab instead of 8 pages began to contain 11, the second tab instead of 30, contained 32 pages, and the third instead of 50 began to contain 55. I read all the forums until the last updated page, ie up to 11, 32 and 55, respectively. The next day, I reopen the forums tab group, but my reading progress remains at its original level, i.e. 8, 30, and 50 pages respectively. It is necessary for the created group to automatically update the current state of the read forum pages and changed tabs within itself. At the time of creating the Forums group, I had 8, 30 and 50 pages in the corresponding tabs, and a day later I read them to 11, 32 and 55, respectively, it is necessary that when I open the Forums group, I see pages 11, 32 and 55, which I was reading, not the original 8, 30 and 50 when the group was created. Sorry for my English, as I wrote through a translator. |
Upgrade to see all 16 reviews